- Our Lady of Fatima's PLEA FOR SACRIFICE
- Traditional Catholic Calendar and Fast Days Explained
- About the Sacrament of Penance and Contrition and about Receiving Forgiveness without an Absolution
- About The SSPX
- About Marcel Lefebvre
- About The SSPV
- About The CMRI
- About The FSSP
- No Baptism of Desire
- No Heretic Pope
- No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church
- About Receiving Sacraments From Heretics
- About Sedevacantism
- How to Pray the Rosary
- Read the Catholic Bible
- Natural Family Planning is Sinful Birth Control
- Sinful Sexual Pleasure and Lust Within Marriage Exposed
- EWTN, Mother Angelica and the Charismatic Movement Exposed
- Most Holy Family Monastery Exposed
- CathInfo.com and Moderator Matthew Exposed
- Tradition In Action Exposed
- Novus Ordo Watch Exposed
- Traditio Exposed
- Important Spiritual Information You Must Know About to be Saved
- On Modesty of the Eyes and Avoiding the Occasion of Sin
- Best Ad Blockers, Image Blockers and Flash/HTML5 Blockers
- About Divorce, Annulments and Remarriage
- No Lustful Kisses and Touches
- No Foreplay
- No Masturbation
- No Sexual Thoughts and Fantasies
- The Prophecies and Revelations of St. Bridget of Sweden [MUST READ]
- Archbishop Thuc Bishops and Consecrations Exposed (The Thuc Line Bishops)
- Bishops Mark Pivarunas and Francis Schuckardt of the CMRI Exposed
- Bishop Richard Williamson of the SSPX Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Bishop Bernard Fellay, SSPX and Antipope Francis Exposed
- Bishop Donald Sanborn Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Bishop Daniel Dolan Exposed (sgg.org and traditionalmass.org)
- Bishop Robert Mckenna Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Fr. Anthony Cekada Exposed Heresies Beliefs and Practices
- Fr. Paul Kramer Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Fr. Rama P. Coomaraswamy Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- Bishop Louis Vezelis Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- Bishop Guerard des Lauriers Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, Pope Gregory XVII, The Pope in Red and The Siri Thesis Exposed
- The Whole Truth about Fr. Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, Feeneyites and the Supposed Excommunication of Fr. Feeney Explained and Exposed
- “Pope” Michael aka David Bawden Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices (vaticaninexile.com)
- Palmarian Church and Clemente Domínguez y Gómez Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- The Remnant Newspaper and Michael Matt Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Daily Catholic (dailycatholic.org) Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- Christorchaos.com and Dr. Thomas A. Droleskey Exposed
- Hutton Gibson Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Gerry Matatics Facts, Beliefs, Heresies and Practices Exposed
- Brother Michael Dimond Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Brother Peter Dimond Exposed Beliefs, Heresies and Practices
- Richard Ibranyi (RJMI), Mary's Little Remnant, johnthebaptist.us Exposed
- Maria Valtorta and The Poem of The Man God Exposed, Reviews and Facts
- Immaculata-One.com, Mike Bizzaro and Victoria DePalma Exposed
- Fisheaters Forum and Tracy's "Vox Clamantis" Heresies Exposed
- Banned from SuscipeDomine.com, SuscipeDomine Exposed, Kaesekopf Exposed
- Banned from Cathinfo.com, Cathinfo Exposed, Matthew Exposed
- Modernism and Modernists: What is Modernism Movement, Definition, Examples, Characteristics, Beliefs
- Conclave and Papal Conclave: Meaning, Definition, Cardinals, Facts and Consequences
- Communicatio In Sacris Facts, Definition, Catholic Teaching and Divine Law
- Una Cum Masses Exposed and The Te Igitur Prayer Controversy Explained
- Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and the Council of Trent
- Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio History, Facts, and Consequences
- Santa Claus, Antichrist of the Season
- The New Mass and the Abomination of Desolation
Note from Ville Hietanen (Jerome): I have changed many of my old positions and do no longer adhere to the strict interpretation as expressed in many of our articles. Now I follow the Doctors, Saints and Theologians of the Church, my conscience, and the teaching of St. Alphonsus, which teaches us that it is the law of conscience that determines whether and uncertain action is lawful or not. Therefore, if you feel good in your conscience about approaching this or that priest (even a Vatican II priest) then you can do so. Therefore, if a position is uncertain or unclear to you (such as Baptism of Desire or Blood), do what you think is right according to your conscience. No one can force you to embrace an uncertain position under pain of sin, and therefore, do not worry about approaching a priest you feel good about approaching, if you feel you need to receive the consolations of mass and the sacraments from this priest.
Please read this article, which more fully explains the situation to another questioner:
Even though I said in the article above that the Vatican II priests are not validly ordained, I in fact am not sure that this is the case anymore. Therefore, you may have a different opinion, or you may share this position. Many in the traditional camp have varied positions on this topic, and no one can force the other to accept his or her position under pain of sin. Therefore, follow your conscience and do what you think is right.
So the the question as to where you should go to mass I answer: Go to any mass or priest that you feel good about approaching according to your conscience. If you feel it is right to go to this or that mass and receive the sacraments from this or that priest, then do so. Your conscience is clean, and that is all that matters.
Concerning our "group exposed" topic. This was the expression of my old beliefs, but is also the still current beliefs of my other old co-worker (or co-owner of the websites) that I have started to distance myself from theologically. Even though the owner of the "prophecyfilm12" mail address still espouses those same views (the strict) I do not, and I would tell you that they are Catholics (those who believe in Baptism of Desire and Blood, NFP and Una Cum etc.) and that they can be approached for the sacraments and mass if you feel good about doing so and you believe this is the right and Catholic choice.
One will simply not become a heretic for embracing (even obstinately) Baptism of Desire or Blood when saints and even popes and the Church tacitly approves of it and even formally approves of it in its teachings (such as in Code of Canon Laws and Catechisms and Theological Manuals and Books). So the Church teaches baptism of desire and blood (but not perhaps dogmatically in the sense MHFM and others would like to have it), but we are heretics for believing in it? No, that is not true. If Pope Pius XII could believe in and teach Baptism of Desire and even NFP (which he did) then so can we. And it does not matter if we know better or have been "corrected" by others, such as by groups such as ourselves or MHFM, - for we are entitled to our own opinion on this matter if we desire to adhere to the teachings of the Saints and Pope Pius XII who all taught Baptism of Desire. Only when the Church has formally condemned Baptism of Desire and Blood or NFP (and such like controversial topics) and not given any more room for doubt, would it be unlawful to embrace those positions. But has this happened? Has Popes really condemned Baptism of Desire in name so that there are no arguments among Catholics about what is the truth? No, they have not! Why else all the arguments and differences in opinions? Popes such as Pius XII even spoke of BOD as Doctrine. So what does it tell us? That the Pope did not view the quotes as we (as in my old views) or MHFM does. It is easy to take a dogma or encyclical and just interpret it 100% strict and even dismiss all Saints and Theologians of the Church, but it is not wise to do so. When all the Theologians and Doctors of the Church teach Baptism of Desire and Blood, then we need to listen. If none of them interprets the dogmas as we or MHFM does, then we are free to accept their explanations and reject that of others. And it does not matter how convincing MHFM or anyone else is or however much they condemn you, - if you are uncertain (and you have aright to be and remain uncertain, for the Church does not teach that you must accept the explanation of random people) and your conscience feel good about adhering to Baptism of Blood or Desire (both of which are doctrines which the Church approved theologians teaches), you are free to adhere to their explanations. I suppose even you see the logic and reason in this position, i.e, that you are free to embrace the approved theologians' position on any topic that your conscience agrees with, and reject the position (or feel uncertain about without incurring sin) the position of non-approved sources, until the Church has formally and undeniably settled this matter.
If Thomas Aquinas (approved Saint and Doctor of the Church) could be saved believing in Baptism of Desire, then so can you, even if we or MHFM condemns you, since you are entitled to be unsure when the Church seems to contradict Herself by both teaching and condemning it, - if you now believe the doctrine could be condemned. Otherwise, the true explanation is that Baptism of Desire is not condemned, and that MHFM and others are over-interpreting the encyclicals and councils.
In conclusion: On topics that are uncertain and unsettled or sensitive (such as mass or the sacraments) follow your conscience and ask the advice of others, such as priests and friends, and do not only strictly follow the strict interpretations of online theologians that often over-interprets things.
You have a right to be uncertain and to adhere to something that you believe is true. Therefore, do not worry about going to a specific priest or mass if you desire to do this. If your conscience is clean on this topic, you are acting right.